In non-international armed conflicts the position is no clearer, as Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions does not address procedural safeguards in internment (it provides for the application of basic judicial guarantees for persons subject to criminal proceedings). Recent State practice in international armed conflicts has demonstrated significant divergences in the interpretation and implementation of the rules, which has given rise to serious concern. The Convention contains procedural rules that aim to ensure that States do not abuse the considerable margin of discretion they have in interpreting threats to their security. It must end as soon as those security reasons cease to exist or, at the latest, when hostilities cease. Internment in international armed conflicts may be imposed under the Fourth Geneva Convention for "imperative reasons of security". In both situations, there is insufficient due process protection of the rights of persons affected. The administrative detention of persons believed to represent a threat to State security is also being more and more widely practiced outside of armed conflicts. Deprivation of liberty for security reasons is an exceptional measure of control that may be taken in armed conflict.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |